On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 08:42:34PM +0100, Chris Ridd wrote: > > I think this is a typo that we all missed in the review. You are > > likely to have better results if you upgrade to the "build 91" version > > of SUNWipkg: > > > > pkg install [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > That's a corker of a typo.
Er, yeah. I guess we're just not used to releasing every build, so this is the first time a single-build typo would have made a difference. Or something. :-/ > Attempting to install the 0.91 version of SUNWipkg just resulted in > the same Python traceback I posted earlier. Huh. Weird. It shouldn't have gotten anywhere near the CPAN package for that. > Installing the 0.91 version of SUNWipkg now works, and pkg image- > update is now doing its thing. Yay! Cool! > I'll capture the state of my installation during the problem, and > raise a bug against pkg tomorrow. (er, which bug database?) defect.opensolaris.org. But if you're filing a bug against the stack trace, I believe that's fixed in the build 91 SUNWipkg, which is why I had you upgrade to it. :) Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
