Danek Duvall wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:31:04AM -0500, Tom Mueller (pkg-discuss) wrote: > > >> Webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tmueller/cr-2309,2310/ >> > > Hm. It's odd that setting pkg/port on a specific instance fails. I wonder > if this is a bug in our manifest? Perhaps an SMF expert could comment on > that aspect? Basically, > > svccfg -s application/pkg/server:default setprop pkg/port = 9999 > > fails with "svccfg: No such property group "pkg".". Drop ":default", and > it works. But shouldn't we be able to set the property per-instance? >
Great comment ... I couldn't figure that out too ... if you do a listprop in interactive svccfg no port is listed per default instance :( Btw. guys ... pkgsend(1) is using port 10000 by default ... why does this sample use 9999 ??? If we plan(do we?) that pkgsend will just work(tm) ater you start your depo according to the man example, I think we should have consistent port with what is pkgsends default, hmm? cheers Lubos > Or am I just totally confused? > > Danek > _______________________________________________ > pkg-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss > _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
