On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 02:29:50PM -0700, Dan Price wrote: > Should that exception handler be tighter? Danek-- isn't this the sort > of exception handler that gets us into trouble when someone does > e.g. ctrl-c during an operation?
Yup. But since all the surrounding exception handlers are doing exactly the same thing, I wasn't going to bring (raise?) that up. We're going to want to do a bunch of exception cleanup in the code eventually. Not sure what the priority on that is. Probably should be higher than it's likely to be. :-/ Also, at least in this case, bailing out of the function is exactly what you'd want ^C to do. So it ends up working out okay, I think. > I was also wondering if this was going to confuse users if it just > exits 0 and seems to do nothing. Should it emit a message? Yeah, that might be useful. <shrug> Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
