> > > Should that exception handler be tighter? Danek-- isn't this the sort > > > of exception handler that gets us into trouble when someone does > > > e.g. ctrl-c during an operation? > > > > Yup. But since all the surrounding exception handlers are doing exactly > > the same thing, I wasn't going to bring (raise?) that up. We're going to > > want to do a bunch of exception cleanup in the code eventually. Not sure > > what the priority on that is. Probably should be higher than it's likely > > to be. :-/ > > Ok. Can we at least get an umbrella bug open on this? We can then do > subsidiary bugs to clean up subsystem by subsystem.
Hold up a minute here. pkgrecv isn't actually using any of our subsystems directly. If we want to open an umbrella bug to generalize stuff, it would make far more sense to generalize the interfaces used by pkg. It would be nice if the parts were interchangeable with pkg, pkgsend, pkgrecv. -j _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
