On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 02:47:34PM -0700, Danek Duvall wrote: > A removal veto would require that it know at disable time what was going to > be removed, and I'm pretty sure that's not done in Bart's current wad. I'm > also not sure what the service would do to exercise the veto.
When removing a pkg from a non-booted environment there'd be no way to excercise the veto short of delaying the pkg removal, but that complicates updates, so, IMO there should be no removal veto, even if there were clever ways to make it work in booted environments. > But what would the grounds be for a veto, anyway? It's not clear to me how > that would actually be useful. That too. _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
