Jordan Brown wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: >> But what would the grounds be for a veto, anyway? It's not clear to me how >> that would actually be useful. > > There are those who believe that an attempt to uninstall a running > service should be rejected. > > (Personally, I disagree with them - I think that if the user said to > uninstall a running service, the service should first be automatically > shut down and then uninstalled. Others disagree. There was a relevant > thread on smf-discuss recently; I believe that it was about whether > r.manifest should automatically shut down services or should reject an > uninstall.)
I just saw a putback to onnv-gate go by that relaxed the requirement that r.mainfest be able to disable the service before its removal. -- Darren J Moffat _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
