On Tue 30 Sep 2008 at 09:11PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 04:54:16PM -0700, Dan Price wrote:
>
> > I'm slightly shocked at the lack of speedup
>
> Once again, I was pointing to the wrong PYTHONPATH when doing the
> calculations.
You get the action item to fix actionbench and fmribench to do whatever
it is needs to be done with PYTHONPATH :) Perhaps just printing its
value would be enough...
> The new code gives:
>
> action creation
> 0.323446 61834 actions/sec
> 0.322086 62095 actions/sec
> 0.322448 62025 actions/sec
> manifest contents loading
> 1.191956 838 manifest contents loads/sec (50337 actions/sec)
> 1.191840 839 manifest contents loads/sec (50342 actions/sec)
> 1.192588 838 manifest contents loads/sec (50310 actions/sec)
>
> so between a 67% increease and a 112% increase in speed. So a little less
> shabby.
That's more like it :) Hurrah!
> As for profiling, it looks like
>
> libpython2.4.so.1.0`PyObject_Malloc+0xb3
> libpython2.4.so.1.0`PyString_FromStringAndSize+0xf4
> _actions.so`_fromstr+0x56f
So, what we expected. Hmm... well, that points to the idea of
storing some stuff in C structs, or something.
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - blogs.sun.com/dp
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
