Darren J Moffat wrote: > Danek Duvall wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 02:30:23PM +0000, Darren J Moffat wrote: >> >>>> That, combined with the fact that he used full FMRIs in his dependencies >>>> means that our optional dependency code falls flat on its face. >>> Does that mean I wouldn't easily be able to upgrade the LWS stuff ? >> I believe so. >> >>> Should I just blow that away and reinstall it all ? >> I'd wait for the next build, but if you don't want to wait (or we don't end >> up backpublishing, though I think with this problem, we'll have to), then >> yes, removing the LWS packages and reinstalling them should do the trick. >> >>> BTW is image update supposed to update everything ? Including my LWS stuff? >> Yes, it should upgrade all packages installed on the system. > > What if I only wanted the latest version of all the stuff I installed > from the LWS repo but I don't want the OS touched ? Or vice versa ?
You can update packages on at a time, but we don't have any functionality currently to update all of the packages for a specific authority. > How do I control that ? You don't right now. -- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
