On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:40:59AM -0800, Michael Schuster wrote: > On 02/10/09 09:28, Michael Schuster wrote: >> On 02/10/09 09:15, Danek Duvall wrote: >>> You've run into >>> >>> 6371 fix for bug 4883 reintroduced 4612 >> >> if I want to apply the fix myself, is it sufficient to modify >> pkgsubprocess.py (or am I stuck until the repo gets updated)? > > to answer my own question: I went ahead and gave it a try, but the outcome > looks very much the same. I checked the .pyc file, it was updated after I > changed the .py file.
Make sure you got it exactly correct -- "posix_spawnp"; I went round and round with someone for an hour while they continually mis-typed the word and not fixing the problem. You can also just add a print statement inside the if-statement to make sure that you're actually getting the memory-saving version of _execute_child(). Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
