On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:48:11AM -0800, Danek Duvall wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:40:59AM -0800, Michael Schuster wrote: > > > On 02/10/09 09:28, Michael Schuster wrote: > >> On 02/10/09 09:15, Danek Duvall wrote: > >>> You've run into > >>> > >>> 6371 fix for bug 4883 reintroduced 4612 > >> > >> if I want to apply the fix myself, is it sufficient to modify > >> pkgsubprocess.py (or am I stuck until the repo gets updated)? > > > > to answer my own question: I went ahead and gave it a try, but the outcome > > looks very much the same. I checked the .pyc file, it was updated after I > > changed the .py file. > > Make sure you got it exactly correct -- "posix_spawnp"; I went round and > round with someone for an hour while they continually mis-typed the word > and not fixing the problem.
FWIW, I attached a patch with the fix to 6371 before I putback. The patch ought to apply cleanly to most incarnations of pkgsubprocess.py. That file isn't seeing a lot of change. -j _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
