I have reworked the webrev,
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~padraig/ips-6549-v3/, to remove all calls to
beadm.
Padraigh
On 02/20/09 19:24, Evan Layton wrote:
Yes you should really be using beDestroy() and attempting to set
the BE_DESTROY_FLAG_FORCE_UNMOUNT flag. Plus as Danek pointed out,
I don't understand why you're using beadm here since the libbe
module is available to you. Also shouldn't this normally be in-sync
with the version of libbe and the build that it's running on?
-evan
Danek Duvall wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:01:04PM +0000, Padraig O'Briain wrote:
We do not want or need to check the process return code.
We are examining the usage statement returned by beadm to determine
whether -F is supported for beadm destroy.
What? You need to be using the libbe module instead of calling beadm.
Danek
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
