> I hate to be a pain, but while you're there, could you please also > test the inverse? > > In other words, can you subtract 10 from the time, and check that we get > a 200 back with some contents and not a 304? > > If that's bogus, or too hard for some reason I haven't thought of, then > you can skip. Just seemed like an easy thing to add.
The timestamp is actually a string, subtracting 10 isn't the best idea. Instead of writing the inverse, I'd be happy to utilize the updatelog the way we would expect it to work in the real world. How about I publish another package to the depot after I get the 304, send my previous timestamp, and verify that I receive an incremental update in response? -j _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
