Darren Reed wrote:
Why not allow for the person doing the development work
to deliver a plugin to pkg(5) that understands said files instead
of using an SMF service? Or would the complexity of allowing
for such outweigh the benefits? (I can well imagine it might or
conversely offer far less in the way of benefits than can be had
easily from SMF.) Have I answered my own question?

Darren, such a plugin would have to work in all contexts
(initial install, upgrade, zone, upgrade of zone in alternate BE,
etc) and would mean that a mistake by the package developer
could corrupt the root filesystem even if the administrator used
the -R option to pkg.  Such a design would effectively preclude
us from introducing new installation contexts (see massive
inability to install third party packages in Zones in early
S10 deployment).

We're NOT going to do that again.  It was a giant mistake in
SVr4 packaging.

- Bar



--
Bart Smaalders                  Solaris Kernel Performance
[email protected]         http://blogs.sun.com/barts
"You will contribute more with mercurial than with thunderbird."
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss

Reply via email to