There's a bunch of work to add links in /usr to /usr/sfw in the SFW
packages. Is this covered by one of teh bugs? 11560 seems like a
candidate, but it doesn't actually have any content.
It's actually really part of
11559 resync repository to snv_124
as the moving of the links is due to the work Norm did in that build in
SFW. The links were there before but delivered by the catch-all
SUNWsf* packages so this change moves the links to the actual component
packages.
Should SUNWGlib and SUNWGtk create /usr/include, too, since they're
creating a link in it?
Indeed they should. I've added
add dir path=usr/include mode=0755 owner=root group=bin
before the other usr/include/<whatever> reference in the respective
import files.
SUNWdesktop-search-firefox misspells its own package name.
Fixed.
Compiz is available for both architectures, but not -devel or -root? That
seems very weird.
SUNWcompiz on SPARC currently only delivers a shell script - that's why
the other two packages are "i386" only at this time (hopefully this
will be resolved over time though.)
I'm not sure there's a reason to name licenses with the package name if
they have the same text (which they do, because they're coming from the
same file).
I sort of followed the examples created by the importer itself where
the license value includes the underlying package name but I can also
made it a more generic "DLJ". Any strong preferences?
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
