The license for the various Java packages is now pointing at DLJ/LICENSE
which containing the line:
" Operating System Distributor License for Java version 1.1"
Is that appropriate for these Java 6 packages? In the pkg workspace,
there is a README in that .../distro-import/DLJ directory that does
mention Java 6, but is this included in those Java packages?
We've been actually using the DLJ forever with OpenSolaris, it's just
the replacement of the license files has occurred by Release
Engineering under the covers. The brief summary is that the DLJ is
also an apprpriate license for the bits we're importing here.
There is a new license .../124/Artistic.html, which isn't HTML.
Why does it have a .html extension?
The 'add license' line for .../124/common/SUNWperl5 contains:
add license Artistic license=SUNWperl584man.Artistic
Shouldn't that be Artistic.html ?
Actually, it's a text file - I think "webrev" is just saying the
pathname of the "New" link is Artistic.html.
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
