[email protected] wrote: > I sort of followed the examples created by the importer itself where > the license value includes the underlying package name but I can also > made it a more generic "DLJ". Any strong preferences?
No, not really. The license stuff needs a bunch of cleanup anyway, and this can be corrected when that happens, but I figured that continuing that practice in a manual setting was probably inappropriate. Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
