Can I get someone to look over the man page changes?
Thanks,
Brock
On 05/ 5/10 03:06 AM, Brock Pytlik wrote:
New webrev:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~bpytlik/ips-15457-v3/
Bug changed to be:
15457 pkg search -p should do more than just wrap the query in <>
The man page has been updated to reflect the new -p behavior.
Thanks,
Brock
On 05/ 3/10 06:04 PM, Brock Pytlik wrote:
On 05/ 3/10 10:03 AM, Danek Duvall wrote:
Brock Pytlik wrote:
While I'm open to -p by default, it's certainly less useful to me,
and
I'm curious to see some actual reasons why people would prefer it,
other
than unsupported statements from you and Shawn expressing your belief
that this is what people expect and/or would want. I know collecting
data on this is hard; I'd be happy even with some anecdotal evidence
>from people not directly on the pkg(5) team.
I agree, that's why I threw out the idea of posing the question on
discussion lists/starting a poll somewhere. By the same token, I'd
like to see more than one person stating they'd like to keep -a as
the default.
I'm also fine with changing the bug synopsis to be "-p doesn't handle
multi-term queries properly" and leave the default where it is.
That would be my preference, since I prefer the action-oriented
output (but
would like -p to DTRT). But I'm happy if you want to poll some of the
lists and get a rough consensus that folks prefer -p by default.
Ok, I'll make the change, leave the default as is, and see if I can
gather some information.
BTW, I didn't check to see if you can override the term-by-term
transformation. That is, if the default is the equivalent of
<smf> </lib/svc/method>
then is there some way of actually specifying
<smf /lib/svc/method>
Yes, don't use -p and put the braces there yourself as you've shown.
? Is
<<smf> </lib/svc/method>>
equivalent to the latter?
<<smf></lib/svc/method>> is equivalent to <smf> </lib/svc/method>
since transforming a list of packages to a list of packages is a noop.
Oh, and you're going to need a man-page update for this change.
Right, thanks for reminding me.
Thanks,
Danek
Thanks for taking a look,
Brock
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
