On 04/19/11 09:03 PM, Danek Duvall wrote:
Bart Smaalders wrote:
This makes sense to me; I've struggled w/ this before.
Cool. And with some further validation of the concept from Rich Lowe, I
present the following webrev:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~dduvall/pkg-svr4root/
for the following bugs:
371 Can't import SVr4 packages with absolute paths
17769 SVR4 conversion assumes BASEDIR is prepended to source
18154 pkgsend problem with importing a SVr4 directory
src/modules/bundle/SolarisPackageDirBundle.py:
lines 158-180: These case slook almost identical except for how the
preserve attribute is handled. Is there any reason to not combine
them?
Not easy to add a unit test I'm assuming?
Otherwise, LGTM.
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
pkg-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
