On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 08:53 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Dmitry Smirnov: > > > On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 9:59:32 PM AEST Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > >> What's the current status? Is there technical progress compared to > what was > >> discussed in April? The freeze is coming really close and we can't > support > >> the status quo for stretch. > > > > Perhaps I'm not the best person to speak on the matter as I've > never > > touched any Golang tools except dh-golang. Situation with Golab > > libraries is not ideal (to say the least) but I understand that > > Golang is not the only language without concept of dynamic > > linking. As I recall someone mentioned Haskell as another example. > > > > It is my understanding that when vulnerability is fixed in Golang > > library it should be sufficient to NMU (re-build) all reverse > > dependencies. > > Part of the problem is that we currently lack a decent way to list all > these reverse dependencies.
I was under the (vague and quite possibly wrong) impression that the ocaml and/or haskell packaging folks had such tooling, might be worth reaching out to them? A bit of websearching found https://people.debian.org/~nomeata/binNMUs- haskell.txt which points to nometa (Joachim?), cc'd, who can perhaps point in the right direction. Ian. _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkgemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers