Moritz, On 08/07/16 20:21, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> And there's also the much bigger problem that we can't actually rebuild > packages on security.debian.org without a lot of manual work! > > The dak installation for security-master has a _lot_ of tech debt. One > that particularly bites us here is that tarballs between security-master > and ftp-master are separate. This e.g. requires that every package that > is new on security-master needs to be build with "-sa" to include source > and we can only issue binNMUs for packages which were at least once > upload to jessie-security/stretch-security etc. I understand the pain here. But again, I don't think we can do anything to fix that. And in this case, seems to me that the effort should be aimed at fixing that technical debt. > And with that setup (and in addition to what Florian mentioned) I see > no sane way that we can support Go applications in stretch. It's > already difficult enough to support a distro of the size of Debian with > volunteers only. So what would be the way forward for this? Declaring golang apps to be not supported for security updates? I am ready to live with that, although I know I will do any work needed to prepare security fixes for the few apps I maintain. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) _______________________________________________ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers
