-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi

In working on a co-installability patch for HDF5, I see an incongruity.
The current library names are
libhdf5.so.7
libhdf5_hl.so.7
libhdf5_fortran.so.7
but
libhdf5*hl*_fortran.so.7

This becomes more striking when we add $FLAVOR for different MPI
flavours, so we get

libhdf5_$FLAVOR_*_* as the pattern.

Now if most compilation is happening with the aid of h5cc / h5pcc and
pkg-config files,
we can fix this to libhdf5_hl_fortran.so.* with minimal impact.

Would anyone have any objections to doing so for the upcoming release
(which changes
soname anyway)?

regards
Alastair

- -- 
Alastair McKinstry, <alast...@sceal.ie>, <mckins...@debian.org>,
https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry
A decent provision for the poor is the true test of civilization.
~Samuel Johnson, Boswell: Life of Johnson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=ejTD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Reply via email to