Hi, Alastair McKinstry a écrit , Le 11/06/2014 12:15: > I've pushed some work on this to a dev-alternatives branch on alioth.
Thanks a lot for this work. How did you produce the detailed map files? What is the recipe to use when updating to a new upstream release? > This is still a work in progress but I've got co-installable serial & > parallel netcdf building from this; As I said before I really don't see any use for setting an alternative against all flavors of the library. What could be the use case for that? > For the incongruity, I'd already implemented the rename when you replied > and found it easier > to simply add a symlink for compatability. I can back it out if peeople > disagree. I still disagree about changing an upstream library name just for a cosmetic matter. Thanks, _g.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel