Hi,

Alastair McKinstry a écrit , Le 11/06/2014 12:15:
> I've pushed some work on this to a dev-alternatives branch on alioth.

Thanks a lot for this work.
How did you produce the detailed map files? What is the recipe to use
when updating to a new upstream release?

> This is still a work in progress but I've got co-installable serial &
> parallel netcdf building from this;

As I said before I really don't see any use for setting an alternative
against all flavors of the library. What could be the use case for that?

> For the incongruity, I'd already implemented the rename when you replied
> and found it easier
> to simply add a symlink for compatability. I can back it out if peeople
> disagree.

I still disagree about changing an upstream library name just for a
cosmetic matter.

Thanks,

_g.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Reply via email to