That makes sense and I don't have an issue with that; I only want it to be clear in the description what package I have to install/depend on. Copying what you've said or something similar into the two package descriptions would be ideal.
George Bateman. On 10 Jan 2017 11:33, "Emmanuel Bourg" <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > Depending on openjfx instead of libopenjfx-java is the intended usage of > the package. libopenjfx-java contains only the library, and openjfx > integrates it with the default JRE. This split was necessary to optimize > the size of the package (openjfx is arch any, if it contained the JavaFX > jars it would waste a lot of space on the mirrors). > > Emmanuel Bourg > >
__ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
