Le Vendredi, Février 01, 2019 16:49 CET, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> a écrit: > Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 16:30:01) > > Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > > > Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 15:16:39) > > >> Le 01/02/2019 à 14:57, Paolo Greppi a écrit : > > >>> Hi, I have prepared an update to node-js-beautify to close this bug > > >>> quickly: > > >>> http://bugs.debian.org/888903 > > >>> > > >>> I have opted for not updating it to 1.8.9 because ATM its > > >>> build-rdepends node-postcss is at version 6.0.23 which we know work > > >>> fine with js-beautify 1.7.5. > > >>> When we update node-postcss we can update node-js-beautify as well. > > >>> > > >>> Please someone sponsor the upload: > > >>> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-js-beautify > > >>> > > >>> Paolo > > >> > > >> I added minimal test during build. Is it OK for the team to rename > > >> js-beautify to js-beautify2 ? > > > > > If you mean the executable, then please simply avoid installing > > > > > instead: > > We can then consider later - without stress - if needed > > > > > at all and if so > > which of them is more suitably renamed). > > > > > If you mean package name then not now, then please don't: That will > > > > > end > > in NEW queue which is too risky at this late date! > > > > > - Jonas > > > See changes, Paolo modified only /usr/bin/js-beautify to > > /usr/bin/js-beautify2 of course > > And I say please don't do that! > > - Jonas
I fully agree with you, that's why I put this discussion here ;-) -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
