Le 01/02/2019 à 18:52, Paolo Greppi a écrit : > Il 01/02/19 16:59, Xavier ha scritto: >> Le Vendredi, Février 01, 2019 16:49 CET, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> a >> écrit: >> >>> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 16:30:01) >>>> Le 01/02/2019 à 15:34, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : >>>>> Quoting Xavier (2019-02-01 15:16:39) >>>>>> Le 01/02/2019 à 14:57, Paolo Greppi a écrit : >>>>>>> Hi, I have prepared an update to node-js-beautify to close this bug >>>>>>> quickly: >>>>>>> http://bugs.debian.org/888903 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have opted for not updating it to 1.8.9 because ATM its >>>>>>> build-rdepends node-postcss is at version 6.0.23 which we know work >>>>>>> fine with js-beautify 1.7.5. >>>>>>> When we update node-postcss we can update node-js-beautify as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please someone sponsor the upload: >>>>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-js-beautify >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paolo >>>>>> >>>>>> I added minimal test during build. Is it OK for the team to rename >>>>>> js-beautify to js-beautify2 ? >>>>>>> If you mean the executable, then please simply avoid installing >>>>>>> instead: > > We can then consider later - without stress - if needed at >>>>>>> all and if so > > which of them is more suitably renamed). >>>>>>> If you mean package name then not now, then please don't: That will end >>>>>>> > > in NEW queue which is too risky at this late date! >>>>>>> - Jonas >>>>> See changes, Paolo modified only /usr/bin/js-beautify to >>>> /usr/bin/js-beautify2 of course >>> >>> And I say please don't do that! >>> >>> - Jonas >> >> I fully agree with you, that's why I put this discussion here ;-) > > node-js-beautify installs three binaries: > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-js-beautify/blob/master/debian/links > as per package.json: > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-js-beautify/blob/master/package.json#L6 > > IMHO it makes sense for the node-* package to match as closely as possible > the node module on npm > since we can't use /usr/bin/js-beautify which is taken, I renamed it ! > > BTW the one I renamed: > > cat /usr/bin/js-beautify2 > #!/usr/bin/env node > > var cli = require('../lib/cli'); > cli.interpret(); > > is different from the one included in python-jsbeautifier: > > cat /usr/bin/js-beautify > #!/usr/bin/python3 > # > # Stub script to run jsbeautifier > # > import sys > from jsbeautifier import main > sys.exit(main()) > > upstream offers two alternative implementations (JS and python), so someone > could legitimately decide to use one or the other > > node-js-beautify has 6 popcon users, I bet the other two are also subscribed > to this list so don't be shy ! > > Paolo
The best way, like said Jérémy, would be to use alternative mechanism, but it supposes to synchronize changes with python packages. -- Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
