Hi,

On 28-05-2022 22:33, Yadd wrote:
On 28/05/2022 21:02, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi Yadd,

On 12-05-2022 10:46, Yadd wrote:
On 12/05/2022 10:11, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Paul Gevers (2022-05-12 09:38:17)
As the maintainer of cacti very I'm interested in getting all those
node-d3-* bugs about depending on nodejs fixed. Does anybody have
objections if I just go ahead and upload all node-d3-* packages that
depend on nodejs with that dependency dropped? Obviously I'll take
what's currently in git as the starting point, drop the dependency,
update the changelog, do a trial build and then upload.

I reached node-d3-dsv by now. You very recently did an upload to experimental of that package. Should I fix the package in both experimental and unstable, or do you think the version in experimental can go to unstable soon?

Paul
PS: still CC me on reply.

Hi Paul,

fix both: experimental version breaks other d3 packages.

Right after I uploaded to experimental, I noticed I made a mistake. This package ships binaries that probably need nodejs (I'll check). I'll repair, but I'll take some time to check *and* come up with a solution to the issue I tried to fix.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to