Hi,
Why not just depend on nodejs:any ?
Le 1 juin 2022 21:36:07 GMT+02:00, Paul Gevers <[email protected]> a écrit :
>Hi Yadd,
>
>On 29-05-2022 16:21, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> fix both: experimental version breaks other d3 packages.
>>
>> Right after I uploaded to experimental, I noticed I made a mistake. This
>> package ships binaries that probably need nodejs (I'll check). I'll repair,
>> but I'll take some time to check *and* come up with a solution to the issue
>> I tried to fix.
>
>Having check the binaries, they indeed need nodejs. So, I propose that we have
>at least the following options:
>* Drop the binaries (least amount of work, but reduces functionality of
> the package)
>* Ship the binaries in a new package, e.g. node-d3-dsv-tools and only
> suggest it from node-d3-dsv
>* Do nothing, but I don't consider that a good option.
>
>What do you think and/or suggest?
>
>Paul
--
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma
brièveté.
--
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
