2015-05-19 9:25 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk>: > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2015-05-19 02:15:29) > > 2015-05-19 1:34 GMT+02:00 Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk>: > >> Please actually look at the uglifyjs source package - or just read > >> closely the original bugreport - before you comment further. I think > >> you will then agree that your remarks are totally irrelevant here. > > > > Well, i actually did that. > > So if you've setup the files with the same tree as in source, that is > > /usr/lib/nodejs/uglify-js/bin/uglifyjs > > /usr/lib/nodejs/uglify-js/lib/*.js > > /usr/lib/nodejs/uglify-js/package.json > > > > and a symlink /usr/lib/nodejs/uglify-js/bin/uglifyjs > > -> /usr/bin/uglifyjs there wouldn't be a need for the patches. > > > > As i said, i'm not questionning the dislike for keeping the original > > tree, i'm just saying that it avoids adding more patches. > > Ohh, now I get it. Thanks for spelling it out to me: I even considered > if you perhaps meant to install _everything_ including the script below > /usr/lib/nodejs but dismissed that as unrealistic. > > So Nodejs lookup path is not only /usr/lib/nodejs/$lib.js and > /usr/lib/$lib/index.js but also /usr/lib/nodejs/$lib/lib/index - or does > it take /usr/lib/nodejs/$lib/package.json into account (I notice there's > a mention of "main" in there - which is actually incorrect now with my > patching)? > > package.json it is
Jérémy.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel
