On തിങ്കള്‍ 05 ഡിസംബര്‍ 2016 03:45 വൈകു, Paolo Greppi wrote:
> It does the trick because the lintian error is gone.

But its bad for long term maintenance, any time that file changes,
you'll have to refresh the patch.
> I'd rather avoid dfsg rightnow because :
> - the specific file is part of the javascript corpus the test suite runs
> on (which we can't run at the moment anyway since it requires browserify)
> - I don't think that makes the package "non-DFSG clean" as a whole

but the removal is for dfsg.

> - sheer ignorance: the dfsg_clean workflow being new for me

See node-levn for an example.

1. Add Files-Excluded to copyright
2. Add repack options to watch
3. Rename to +dfsg.orig and edit the orig.tar, remove the file (I use
graphical tools like file-roller)
4. Edit changelog
5. Import the +dfsg.orig (gbp import-orig)

If you get it working, may be add it to a wiki page.

> There are about 6 dependencies left to go plus babel + gulp as build
> deps. The latter is the same short-term focus as
> https://www.generosity.com/community-fundraising/debian-browserify-2 so
> yes maybe it can be done !

This campaign did not receive much support (only 7% of the target). But
we are still working on it. We need to complete about 30 modules to
finish gulp. Any help in finishing that list would be awesome.

All babel modules are in a single repo, Shanavas is trying to automate
it. But we still need to package non babel dependencies from here.

https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/babel-cli

https://wiki.debian.org/Javascript/Nodejs/Tasks/gulp needs tiny
submodules of lodash but we need help for that
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845227 can you try it?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
Pkg-javascript-devel mailing list
Pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-javascript-devel

Reply via email to