Hi Torsten, I'm in process of updating lensfun in Debian.
In data domenica 15 novembre 2015 20:55:54, Torsten Bronger ha scritto: > Lensfun just released a version 0.3.2. Changes in the build system > are intended to make Debian packaging easy. > > Moreover, not only the library file is properly versioned > (liblensfun.so.x), Thanks for this, this is basically what blocked me in updating lensfun one year ago (and then ran out of free time for this). > the same is now implemented for the database > itself. Multiple database version can live happily together on the > same filesystem. This is necessary because every binary library > depends on a particular file format of the database, and this file > format may change over time, independently of the ABI version. > > We suggest to count the database format version in the Debian > package name as it is common for libraries: lensfun-data1, > lensfun-data2, etc. Hm, on a Debian system you don't have multiple versions of lesfun though, i.e. only one liblensfunN, so that version has just one version of the data; hence, if I make liblensfunN x.y.z depend on liblensfun-data >= x.y.z, that should ensure the library has the data it needs, no? From what I see, changes in the data of a library (as long as those data are accessed by the library and only by that) should not matter to users of the library itself. Am I missing something? -- Pino Toscano
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ pkg-kde-extras mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras