Hi! Amarok is currently unbuildable on unstable because of a missing dependency (#877295) and soon it will be a double issue trough #896941.
I know that there is an upstream effort to provide a Qt5-based amarok, but does that means we should keep it unbuildable in unstable? I would simply prefer to remove it, but maybe I am missing something here. So, if you have any thoughts on why we should not remove it, please do say so. Cheers! -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
