Hi! Amarok is currently unbuildable on unstable because of a missing 
dependency (#877295) and soon it will be a double issue trough #896941.

I know that there is an upstream effort to provide a Qt5-based amarok, but 
does that means we should keep it unbuildable in unstable?

I would simply prefer to remove it, but maybe I am missing something here. So, 
if you have any thoughts on why we should not remove it, please do say so.


Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply via email to