On Thursday, May 17, 2018 11:34:52 PM CET Scott Kitterman wrote: > It doesn't sound to me like it's currently suitable for release. What about > uploading a building version to experimental, removing from unstable, and > then if a modernized version appears, it can go to unstable again without > getting stuck in New.
Isn't it time to kill it? There is the following chain of interest: We would like to remove QtWebkit in qt4 edition. That requires disabling QtWebkit support in libplasma (kde4libs edition). This exposes symbols so a transition is needed / package name change is needed. The only plasma user is amarok. So, I'm proposing to RoM/QA amarok, and then we can get rid of qtwebkit. /Sune -- I didn’t stop pretending when I became an adult, it’s just that when I was a kid I was pretending that I fit into the rules and structures of this world. And now that I’m an adult, I pretend that those rules and structures exist. - zefrank -- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
