Hi, Monday 14 July 2008, Ana Guerrero rašė: > a) Use backports.org, i do not like this too much because: > [snip] > pros: it has support for most used archs, and it is autobuilt. - People would be able to backport plasmoids and upload them to backports.org However, KDE 4.1.x term is pretty short and this point might not be very important.
> b) Search for a mirror space where optionally (but very welcome) reprepo > can be used. The domain kde4.debian.net could be pointed there. I would also prefer this approach. Actually, a mixed one. More bleeding edge backports at kde4.debian.net and once they all meet backports.org requirements (i.e. testing migration), they can be re-uploaded to backports.org > cons: > [snip] > -only able to upload packages for amd64/i386, no powerpc. Initially, they can be amd64/i386. Maybe someone will volunteer to build powerpc packages and when packages meet backports.org criteria, they can be reuploaded there to benefit from backports.org pros. -- Modestas Vainius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
