On Tue, 19 May 09 20:41, trig...@space-based.de wrote: > What do you think?
So, no feedback here so far, we are really more IRC than mailinglist users. What I understand so far is, that installing presubj files for all packages is not an option, because e.g. people get used to simply ignore the presubj messages. The question is, if presubj files should be installed for packages which create a lot of reports like Konqueror, Kmail, Akreator, Plasma... These days people started to tag all upstream bugs as those and reply with the template provided by Modestas. Is this our new policy? Do we officially not forward bugreports anymore (at least as long as we have no "Bugsqad") and tell people immediately to take this upstream? I am just asking, because my impression after various discussions e.g. on d...@l.d.o has been that this is considered quite rude. But in fact it is way less rude than just letting the bugs rot forever. So, can we agree on something official? The "default template"-solution has my vote FWIW... Greetings, Armin -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
