Hi, > 1) We would use the same workflow as for qt4-x11.git, i.e. no upstream branch. > It proved to be fine, didn't it? Fathi, you worked most with qt4-x11.git, is > there anything you would like to be changed?
nothing to change, I like the workflow we have with Qt. > Secondary motivation is that centralized svn is ageing while git is > distributed, fast, has some nice features and is the most featureful DVCS at > the moment. it will save space on the harddisk ;) > Last but not least, KDE upstream is eventually switching to git. %s/eventually//g git.kde.org is set up. As you can see, I used git on most new Qt related packages. +1 to switch KDE packaging to git. It isn't clear on your mail but the switch to git is for pkg-kde svn. IMHO, the switch should includes kde-extras and krap. For KDE Extras, it will avoid fragmentation as we have some packages in svn.d.o and some other on git.d.o. Cheers, Fathi -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
