On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 04:40:00PM +1100, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Thursday, 17 November 2016 9:44:39 PM AEDT Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > firefox-dev is not in stretch, and it is not planned that it
> > ever will be (see #817954).
> > firefox-esr-dev might be the alternative, but the Mozilla maintainers
> > (Cc'ed on this bug) should be able to give a more definite answer
> > on that.
> What exactly am I expected to do about this bug?? If "firefox-dev" is not
> meant to be in Stretch than it should have "serious" bug instead of packages
> that depend on "firefox-dev".
Wait what? Packages that build depend on a package that is not in
stretch are in stretch? WTF?
> Should I just replace "firefox-dev" with "firefox-esr-dev"?
Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list