On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:28:42 (CET), Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> RT> there is currently a vote on this ongoing right now...
> I'm sorry, I think I missed it, can you point me to it?
hm. it seems the message at
is archived defectively. In that mail, I wrote this:
| From this discussion, I gather the following options:
| A) stick with jack1
| B) have jack2 in squeeze
| C) have both jack1&jack2 in squeeze
| F) further discussion
| With such an fictional ballot, I'd vote:
| If you care to comment on this issue, please participate in the vote, so
| that we can assemble a report for the release team quickly.
So far, only fabian as replied:
| Am 18.03.2010 15:35, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
| > If you care to comment on this issue, please participate in the vote, so
| > that we can assemble a report for the release team quickly.
| I am indifferent between A and B, just because I am lacking knowledge
| about jack internals. But either of both is IMHO better than
| maintaining both packages, which will require a lot of new
| infrastructure and redundant work and further discussion only slows
| things down even more. So my vote is:
| My vote should not be decisive for the choice between jack1 and jack2.
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list