|--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:53:15 +0100, Adrian Knoth 
<a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> said:

  AK> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:34:07PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
  AK> [jackd2 over jackd1]
  >>> jack1) and apparently is what the upstream recommends as well.
  >>I see no such thing on their webpage, nor in their mailing list
  >>(although I don't pay that much attention there). 

  AK> This was also new to me. I never came across such a recommendation.

Okay, so I guess it was only my misunderstanding on my part. I don't
recall exactly where I read it, but I remember something about new
features being implemented only in jack2, though this might not be
entirely true anymore.

  >>Maybe asking upstream is a good idea.

  AK> I already did, the answer was: "Huu, this is a political question."

  AK> Which in turn means: technically speaking, it's fine to use either of
  AK> the versions.

So let's use the best one of them or the one we feel meets the needs of
our users most.



pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to