On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 05:06:24PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Given the tons of C++ symbols in jackd2, I'd also suggest to make the > > jackd1 package the official dev package and also the "donator" of the > > symbols file. > > I'm quite confused by this. AFAIK, jack is a pure C API, so C++ > symbols have no place in there.
Yep. But jackd2 is implemented in C++, and these symbols somehow are public or leak into the symbols file (also with -fvisibility=hidden). > However, I understood from the last discussion that those are not > really bogus, but are some sort of internal (server-lib) API, which is > not allowed to be used by regular clients. Is this correct? Exactly. > Anyway, I really think that for jack it is much better to use a shlibs > file. I'm completely fine with a shlibs file. Makes things a lot easier. Cheerio -- mail: [email protected] http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
