On 26/08/10 07:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +0000, > rosea-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: >> changed in build-depends libjack-dev to libjack-dev | >> libjack-jackd2-dev, assuming this is the right and new approach to >> handle jack1 and jack2 in debian > >> - libjack-dev (>= 0.105), >> + libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev, > > > No. Above means "one of these two *specific* implementations are > required". > > When you mean "any implementation is required", then instead use this: > > libjack-dev | libjack0.100.0-dev >
No. Your solution means either libjack-dev or a virtual package we are trying to phase out (libjack0.100.0-dev). We really need to sort this out, but for now packages should just build-depend on libjack-dev. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers