On 26/08/10 07:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +0000,
> rosea-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>> changed in build-depends libjack-dev to libjack-dev |
>> libjack-jackd2-dev, assuming this is the right and new approach to
>> handle jack1 and jack2 in debian
>> - libjack-dev (>= 0.105),
>> + libjack-dev | libjack-jackd2-dev,
> No. Above means "one of these two *specific* implementations are
> When you mean "any implementation is required", then instead use this:
> libjack-dev | libjack0.100.0-dev
No. Your solution means either libjack-dev or a virtual package we are
trying to phase out (libjack0.100.0-dev).
We really need to sort this out, but for now packages should just
build-depend on libjack-dev.
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list