Артём, you are CCed because I don't know if you are subscribed to the list.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:09, Dan S <danstowell+de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/6 Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org>:
> > Hi all, (Dan CCed because I'm not sure if you are subscribed to the list)
> > I managed to take a few minutes to take a look at the package and it is
> > not in a very good shape (it was still using simple-patchsys!). I have
> > worked a bit on it, but it still has a long way to go. I will try to
> > work on it during this week, I think I can find one hour or two.
> > Dan, as you are part of upstream, could you comment on the patches
> > included in the packaging? I can see they are in upstream svn ubuntu
> > packaging module, with yourself as last commiter on most of them. They
> > are older than the latest sc release, though.
> Hi - sorry for slow reply, I missed this thread. Most of the patches
> are by other people but I will try to comment:
> - not sure I'm afraid, it's connected with the emacs sc3 mode, which
> I don't use. Looks like it might disable something from running simply
> because the build machine isn't the target machine.
> - another emacs mode thing, not sure.
Does anyone use emacs and can comment on wether this should be applied
upstream? The patch changes the elisp install path from
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp to /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/supercollider
> - build machine != target machine so don't error out if no ruby executable
> - build machine != target machine so don't modify machine's mime database
Dan, can you comment on whether these can be upstreamed? I don't see
why they should be debian-specific.
> - the 'scvim' script is a wrapper which launches vim with the sc3
> plugin. debian vim-addons policy requires the plugin not to be
> auto-enabled when installing, so we must modify the scvim script to
> detect if the addon is not enabled, and to help the user enable it if
> they want to. (Needs to be a patch since vim-addon-manager not
> necessarily used on all linuxes)
This one has been upstreamed, great!
> - I'm not clear on why the change from -rpath to -rpath-link has to
> be done here as a patch. cc'ing this message to Артём who may be able
> to comment on this, and possibly others.
This looks like it could be upstreamed too?
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list