On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> wrote: > Am 22.11.2010 10:18, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard: >> >> This is bad: t-p-u does not get the same exposure and automated >> testing time before sliding into testing. This means a higher burden >> on the Release team for such uploads, and likely less interest in >> acceptance due to the weaker testing process! > > But the changes to the source will be really minor, and the RT can even see > this from the debdiff. > > _______________________________________________ > pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list > pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers >
Ok. Sorry I'm getting around to this just now. I'm going to go ahead and revert 2.7-5 changes and upload a 2.7-6 package with just the one change to fix the segfault. I imagine the RT are not going to accept 2.7-5 into testing once they realize this was a mistaken upload. The branch to use for unstable upload is 'unstable'. Also, I'm updating the 'unstable' branch to add the 2.7-5 changelog, and to add the next entry which explains that changes in 2.7-5 is being reverted. Also, since squeeze hasn't been released yet, we should just request a freeze exception. A freeze exception request should be done anyway since faad2 provides a library. -- Regards, Andres Mejia _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers