On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:10:51PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote:

> Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, > but this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides > libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo > in soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem?

The changelog in



   * Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to
     libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy.
     - Obsolete c2 naming due to CXX transition is not needed anymore.
     - ardour used to provide libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch0-dev as
       in #271108. These packages were removed in 2004.

So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust
ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of
this if agreed upon.

It's libsoundtouch0-dev. The question is: Why doesn't libsoundtouch-dev exist?

Virtual unversioned -dev package names providing a corresponding versioned package is an optional convenience feature, not mandated. Also, it makes sense to use directly only if a single real package satisfies that virtual dependency at each distro suite.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to