2015-09-16 11:32 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <[email protected]>: > On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: >> >> So here's the suggestion. Instead of >> >> ardour -> a2 >> ardour3 -> a3 >> ardour4 -> a4 >> >> I propose >> >> ardour -> a4 >> ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie) >> drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) ) >> > > now that both ardour (4.2) and ardour3 (back to 3.5.403) are uploaded to > unstable, i wonder about that last line: > shouldn't we drop ardour3 asap? right now? > > probably adding another transitional package (for stretch). > > i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug > (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be > raised to "important").
I would remove it. best mira _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
