2015-09-16 12:38 GMT+02:00 Jaromír Mikeš <[email protected]>: > 2015-09-16 11:32 GMT+02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) > <[email protected]>: >> On 2015-04-19 14:13, Adrian Knoth wrote: >>> >>> So here's the suggestion. Instead of >>> >>> ardour -> a2 >>> ardour3 -> a3 >>> ardour4 -> a4 >>> >>> I propose >>> >>> ardour -> a4 >>> ardour3 -> a3 (legacy tree for jessie) >>> drop ardour3 after jessie+1 (what's the new codename? ;) ) >>> >> >> now that both ardour (4.2) and ardour3 (back to 3.5.403) are uploaded to >> unstable, i wonder about that last line: >> shouldn't we drop ardour3 asap? right now? >> >> probably adding another transitional package (for stretch). >> >> i simply see no reason to keep ardour3 around, and it has a crasher bug >> (#778363) triggered by loading any MIDI file (i think that should be >> raised to "important"). > > I would remove it.
What should we do with these bugs? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=ardour They are not appropriate probably anymore as we moved ardour4 to ardour package. Should we just close them? best mira _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
