On 19.04.2013 23:28, David Paleino wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:52:44 +0200, colliar wrote:


>> I could live with a three month delay but everything older is quite
>> outdated regarding josm's development.
> I know :|
> I will try maintaining a backport, just don't expect it to be released 
> together
> with the version in sid, expect some delay (I'd say a week is reasonable?) :)

Good news.

Why not just adapt migration policy from testing ?
So testing and stable-backport will be the same version.

I do not know your update circles. But I would expect experimental to
have at maximum a delay of ten days compared to JOSM tested and unstable
one month.

ATM (numbers from [1] and [2]):
- experimental (r5759) - six weeks
- unstable (r5608) - 20 weeks
- testing (r5267 with some patches) - at least eight month
- stable (r3376) - two years and nine month

> Thanks for your report,

Always welcome


[1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/DevelopersGuide/Schedule
[2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/josm.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Pkg-osm-maint mailing list

Reply via email to