Dear XFCE4 and LXDE maintainers, Am Donnerstag, den 17.07.2014, 15:38 +0200 schrieb Andreas Henriksson: > Could you please ask your question about dropping evince-gtk to those > that use it? eg. the XFCE or LXDE people. > > I have no objections against dropping it if noone feel they need it and > updates their dependencies accordingly.
I'd like to ask you to elaborate if a separate evince-gtk package is still necessary for your purposes, please. I have given a rationale in #755071: > Hi all, > > I wonder if a separate evince-gtk package is still necessary at all. > If I am > not mistaken, evince has only two more package dependencies than > evince-gtk: > libnautilus-extension1a and libsecret-1-0. > > Since evince-gtk identifies itself as "evince without GNOME keyring > support", I > guess it is the second dependency that is meant to get removed by the > separate > build. However, libsecret-1-0 has only two additional dependencies > that aren't > pulled in by evince[-gtk] anyway: libgcrypt11 and libsecret-common, of > which > the latter is an Arch: all package without further dependencies. The > libnautilus-extension1a package in turn pulls in libselinux1. > > So, is this it? Do we really need a separate binary package of evince > to avoid > the installation of four leaf packages? Cheers, - Fabian _______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
