On 15/10/14 23:34, Michael Biebl wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 19:17:10 +0200 Fabian Greffrath
<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear XFCE4 and LXDE maintainers,
Am Donnerstag, den 17.07.2014, 15:38 +0200 schrieb Andreas Henriksson:
Could you please ask your question about dropping evince-gtk to those
that use it? eg. the XFCE or LXDE people.
I have no objections against dropping it if noone feel they need it and
updates their dependencies accordingly.
I'd like to ask you to elaborate if a separate evince-gtk package is
still necessary for your purposes, please. I have given a rationale in
#755071:
Hi all,
I wonder if a separate evince-gtk package is still necessary at all.
If I am
not mistaken, evince has only two more package dependencies than
evince-gtk:
libnautilus-extension1a and libsecret-1-0.
Since evince-gtk identifies itself as "evince without GNOME keyring
support", I
guess it is the second dependency that is meant to get removed by the
separate
build. However, libsecret-1-0 has only two additional dependencies
that aren't
pulled in by evince[-gtk] anyway: libgcrypt11 and libsecret-common, of
which
the latter is an Arch: all package without further dependencies. The
libnautilus-extension1a package in turn pulls in libselinux1.
So, is this it? Do we really need a separate binary package of evince
to avoid
the installation of four leaf packages?
Could we have some input from the XFCE/LXDE maintainers on this matter?
FWIW the only differences are --disable-nautilus --without-keyring, which in
term of Depends it means no dependency on libnautilusextension1a or
libsecret-1-0. Note that the keyring functionality no longer depends on
libgnome-keyring0 as it used to do. Though it may be rather useless if you don't
depend on anything that implements the "secret" service.
Emilio
_______________________________________________
Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
