On jeu., 2015-05-14 at 14:23 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Hi Yves-Alexis, > > Am Donnerstag, den 14.05.2015, 13:46 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez: > > Note that Xfce maintainers aren't the only relevant people here, > > although it might be the easiest to consult. I don't really like having > > to force Xfce users to install libnautilus (which actually bother me > > more than libsecret), but I'm pretty sure evince-gtk is used by a lot of > > people from the “non DE” crowd (people using only a WM). Sure, they can > > switch to xpdf instead, but evince-gtk was a really nice alternative I > > think. > > thank you very much for your reply. Indeed, I did not have the non-DE > crowd in mind when requesting the removal of evince-gtk. > > Actually, no file in /usr/bin/evice* is linked against libnautilus, > but /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-3.0/libevince-properties-page.so is: > > $ ldd /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-3.0/libevince-properties-page.so | grep > nautilus > libnautilus-extension.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnautilus-extension.so.1 > (0x00007fa0da86e000) > > Maybe this can be factored out into a separate package and everybody is > happy?
I guess so, yes. If what annoys you most about evince-gtk is the double build (which I can understand) and not the separate binary package, then I guess it's the most sensible solution. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
