Ok then I don’t get the use case. Can you describe when a user would do such a thing and what are they trying to accomplish?
-----Original Message----- From: Leif Johansson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 1:22 AM To: Trevor Freeman Cc: Peter Saint-Andre; [email protected] Subject: Re: [plasma] why not web portal mail? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/13/2011 01:11 AM, Trevor Freeman wrote: > I realize at the physical level with IM it uses a sequence of messages which > hare relayed server to server. Just as with VoIP, an audio stream is packaged > as a sequence of IP packets. However there is no concept of long term > persistence of information outside of the IM session (I am ignoring > auditing). I don’t have an IM inbox. > > The closest I can get is if I persist my IM history I would invoke the policy > but it's not intuitive I would spawn more im sessions based on that as I > would forward or reply all with email. Yes you do! XEP-0060 is exactly your XMPP inbox. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk2lXUAACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnei6QCeNXQ5S0rMvwkoEQxkhjr1OEPh j+wAn1dkalg+lZBnxzbhbJUVrwmIpE9e =WnBF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ plasma mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma
